citee-methodology/prompts/example-swiece-sojowe-pl.md
Jacek Kubas f76cf2858b v1.0.0 — initial Citee Index Methodology release
Foundational public methodology for the first open public ranking of brand
visibility in AI search results (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude).

This release establishes the framework — no rankings have been computed
or published yet. First scan cycle: late May 2026 (private validation).
First public ranking publication target: August 2026, after 3 validation
cycles.

Includes:
- methodology.json: machine-readable formulas, weights, policies
- README.md: human-readable overview + open/closed boundary
- CHANGELOG.md: versioning policy + v1.0.0 release notes
- taxonomy.md: tier system + 11 PL pilot categories
- LICENSE: MIT
- .gitignore: closed operational data (exact prompts, anti-gaming thresholds)
- prompts/README.md: 6-stage prompt curation process
- prompts/example-swiece-sojowe-pl.md: illustrative framework for first category

Strategic principles:
- Algorithm-first, no advisory board
- Open methodology + closed exact prompts (Goodhart's Law defense)
- No retroactive changes (FIDE 2024 lesson)
- No pay-to-play, hard rule (Moody's / Forbes 30 Under 30 lessons)
- Subjective opinion disclaimer (Gartner v. NetScout 2020 First Amendment shield)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-03 17:25:56 +02:00

4.2 KiB
Raw Blame History

Example prompt framework — Świece sojowe PL

Illustrative framework showing how a category prompt pool is structured. Exact production strings remain CLOSED in prompts/swiece-sojowe-pl/ (gitignored).

This document is public to demonstrate the curation process and prompt-type distribution. It is not the actual production prompt list.


Distribution

100 prompts total, distributed by type:

Type Count Weight Share
Buying intent 30 2.0 30%
Comparison 25 1.5 25%
Specific need 20 1.5 20%
Informational 15 0.3 15%
Brand-direct 10 0.3 10%

Personas referenced

  • "30+ kobieta kupująca prezent dla mamy"
  • "Self-care millennial 2535 po pracy"
  • "Wnętrzarz minimalistyczne mieszkanie"
  • "Mężczyzna kupujący prezent walentynkowy"
  • "Mama małych dzieci szukająca bezpiecznego zapachu"
  • "Eko-świadomy konsument 30+"
  • "Hostess kupująca świece dla agroturystyki"

Buying intent (30 prompts × 2.0 weight) — illustrative examples

These prompts signal active purchase intent. Highest weight because they correlate directly with revenue impact for ranked brands.

  • "Gdzie kupić premium ręcznie robioną świecę sojową na prezent dla mamy"
  • "Polska marka świec sojowych z certyfikatem ekologicznym do 200 zł"
  • "Świeca sojowa w eleganckim opakowaniu jako prezent firmowy"
  • "Gdzie zamówić zestaw prezentowy z polskich świec sojowych handmade"
  • (...26 more, exact strings closed)

Comparison (25 prompts × 1.5 weight) — illustrative examples

Decision-stage queries. User is comparing brands or making a choice.

  • "JAKULO vs Naturaodpauli — która polska marka świec sojowych lepsza"
  • "Najlepsze polskie świece sojowe handmade 2026 ranking"
  • "Polskie świece sojowe premium — porównanie najpopularniejszych marek"
  • (...22 more, exact strings closed)

Specific need (20 prompts × 1.5 weight) — illustrative examples

Specific use cases or attributes — buyer knows what they want.

  • "Świeca sojowa o zapachu wanilii i bursztynu w średnim rozmiarze"
  • "Długo paląca naturalna świeca sojowa do sypialni 60 godzin"
  • "Świeca sojowa bezzapachowa dla osoby z alergią na zapachy"
  • (...17 more, exact strings closed)

Informational (15 prompts × 0.3 weight) — illustrative examples

Research-stage queries. Lower weight because easily gamed by content marketing fluff.

  • "Czym różni się świeca sojowa od parafinowej"
  • "Jak rozpoznać prawdziwie sojową świecę"
  • "Czy świece sojowe są zdrowe i bezpieczne"
  • (...12 more, exact strings closed)

Brand-direct (10 prompts × 0.3 weight) — illustrative examples

Direct brand queries. Lower weight because brand winning queries about itself = baseline expectation, not value-add.

  • "JAKULO opinie 2026 czy warto kupować"
  • "Co sądzą o polskiej marce świec Naturaodpauli"
  • (...8 more, exact strings closed)

Anti-patterns (excluded)

The following types of prompts are explicitly excluded during Stage 4 (Vendor exploit hunter critic):

Pattern Reason Example
Single-word No buyer intent, ambiguous "świeczki", "świece"
Hobbystyczny / DIY Off-topic for retail "DIY świece sojowe w domu"
B2B retail Not consumer-facing "hurtownia świec sojowych Warszawa"
Brand-agnostic generic Easy content marketing target "co to świeca sojowa"
Price-only without category context Too vague "tania świeca"
Off-topic technicality Detection of hobby-craft, not retail "knot bawełniany do świec wymiary"
Polish typos at scale Not real query patterns "swieczka sojova" (single typo OK if frequent in real data)

Quarterly rotation policy

Each quarter, 20 prompts (20% of pool) are rotated:

  • 10 retired (lowest real-world search signal in past 90 days, OR known to be gamed)
  • 10 added (new patterns from Reddit/Quora/trends, new persona refinements, new product attributes emerging)

Rotation log is committed to prompts/swiece-sojowe-pl/rotation_log.md (closed) with rationale per swap.


This framework is illustrative. The actual 100 production prompts evolve with each quarterly cycle and are not published as exact strings — only the distribution, personas, anti-patterns, and example patterns are public.